Posted on July 1st, 2014

Reaching Orbit – World Cup

32-panelWhile this may appear to be a flaming soccer ball, tragically it is not. This is a standard 32 panel soccer ball being tested in the Ames water channel. The green lines shows the water flow around the ball, and the pink area is the low-pressure zone behind the object. (Photo Credit: NASA’s Ames Research Center)
BrazucaThe brand new Brazuca soccer ball used in the 2014 FIFA World Cup undergoes an aerodynamics study in a wind tunnel at the Ames’ Fluid Mechanics Laboratory. Note the bumps on the surface of the soccer ball, used to reduce drag and increase the kicking distance. (Photo Credit: NASA’s Ames Research Center)

It’s that time again, when the world’s most beloved sport pits one country against another. Soccer, or football as the rest of the world calls it, draws the attention of hundreds of millions of fans especially during the World Cup. There are heated and sometimes violent disagreements as to who’s team is the greatest of all time, what referee makes the worst call and who is obviously cheating. Sometimes, even the ball itself is to blame for intense contention between fans. With this in mind, after the last World Cup frustration when their Jabulani soccer ball behaved erratically at times, Adidas worked with a number of players in the design and construction of this year’s regulation soccer ball, the Brazuca.

NASA also has football fever, they set up the traditional 32 panel soccer ball and the new Brazuca ball in their 2 foot by 2 foot wind tunnel at the Ames’ Fluid Mechanics Laboratory to see how air flows around the different designs. To the untrained eye, such as mine, one might think that a soccer ball is just as good as the next. The kind we used as children had the iconic 32 diamond panels and were relatively smooth. It would be easy to think that a spherical object with a smooth surface would be the most aerodynamic, well you would be wrong. The smooth sphere creates a large amount of drag behind a soccer ball, since all of the air is flowing around it and meeting at the tail end to create an area of low pressure behind.

The Jabulani ball had eight panels and was relatively smooth. The Brazuca only has six panels, with longer, deeper seams and a surface that is covered with small bumps. The bumps disturb the air around the ball, decreasing drag and the size of the low pressure wake behind it. This causes the soccer ball to travel further.

So what will be different this year then 4 years ago? The Brazuca ball should travel more predictably, instead of knuckling off in a random directions. While kickers may be bummed, the goalies will surely appreciate a more stable flight pattern.

Katie Nelson
Geospatial Ninja
(303) 718-7163
Katie@apollomapping.com

Share This Article
This entry was posted in The Geospatial Times and tagged , , , , by Apollo Mapping. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    The Geospatial Times Archive